Huawei strikes deal to build Russia’s first 5G network


LOU: CHINESE TECH GIANT HUAWEI SIGNING A DEAL TO ASSIST RUSSIAN TELECOM COUNTRY. THAT DEAL COMING AS CHINESE PRESIDENT XI JINPING IS MEETING WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN. THEY’VE MET 30 TIMES OVER THE PAST SIX YEARS. XI GOING SO FAR AS TO CALL PUTIN HIS VERY BEST FRIEND. I ADDED THE “VERY.” IT WAS JUST BEST FRIEND. THERE IT IS. PRESIDENT TRUMP THREATENED MORE TARIFFS ON CHINESE GOODS IN THE COMING WEEKS.>>WHEN AM I GOING TO PUT THE EXTRA $325 BILLION WORTH OF TARIFFS? I WILL MAKE THAT DECISION, I WOULD SAY, OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS, PROBABLY RIGHT AFTER THE G-20. ONE WAY OR ANOTHER I’LL MAKE THAT DECISION AFTER THE G-20. I’LL BE MEETING WITH PRESIDENT XI AND WE’LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS. LOU: THAT G-20 SUM HIM LOU: THAT G-20 SUMMIIM LOU: THAT G-20 SUMMITM LOU: THAT G-20 SUMMIT TAKES PLACE JUNE 28 AND 29.>>>JOINING ME NOW, JAMES FREEMAN, ASSISTANT EDITORIAL AT “THE WALL STREET JOURNAL,” GREAT AMERICAN, GOOD TO HAVE YOU WITH US. XI AND PUTIN LINING UP TOGETHER. TWO COMMIES. SHOULD ANY OF US BE SURPRISED THEY LIKE ONE ANOTHER?>>I LONG WITH HUAWEI’S OTHER PROBLEMS, I THINK IT NEEDS WORK ON PUBLIC RELATIONS TOO. BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO ME, IF YOU’RE TRYING TO SAY WE’RE NOT A THREAT, WE’RE NOT DANGEROUS, YOUR NEXT MOVE IS NOT TO SAY LOOK AT OUR NEW BUSINESS PARTNER, VLADIMIR PUTIN. LOU: WE MIGHT HAVE HYPER SONIC MISSILES AND WE’RE TICKLED PINK TO TRY THEM OUT.>>JUST IN TERMS OF IF THIS WAS MEANT TO BE AN ECONOMIC SHOW OF FORCE, RUSSIA WE TAKE SERIOUSLY BECAUSE IT’S RUN BY A THUG AND BECAUSE THEY HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. ITS ECONOMY IS LESS THAN 10% THE SIZE OF OURS. THIS IS NOT A HUGE — LOU: BUT WE DON’T TAKE CHINA SERIOUSLY BECAUSE IT’S RUN BY A GUY IN A THREE-PIECE SUIT AND BUTTON DOWN COLLAR? COME ON. HE’S STEALING HALF A PILL ONDOLLARS FROM US A YEAR. PUTIN ISN’T DOING THAT.>>IF PEUT SEASON NOT IT’S BECAUSE HE DOESN’T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY. LOU: I DIDN’T SAY IT WASN’T A MATTER OF WHEREWITHAL. I WASN’T SUGGESTING IT WAS A HIGHER MORAL PLAIN ON WHICH VLADIMIR PUTIN LIVES. BUT THE FACT IS, ONE IS A THIEF OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS AND THE OTHER CAN’T GET IT DONE.>>I WOULD SAY THERE’S MORE UPSIDE THAN DOWNSIDE WITH CHINA. WE OBVIOUSLY DRAW A LOT OF BENEFITS FROM TRADE WITH CHINA. BUT WE HAVE A BIG PROBLEM — LOU: WAIT A MINUTE. THINK ABOUT THAT PROPOSITION. WE DRAW A LOT OF BENEFITS FROM CHINA. THEY STEAL HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS FROM US EVERY YEAR, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TECHNOLOGY. THEY ALSO MAINTAIN A 350 BILLION-DOLLAR TRADE SURPLUS, OR TO US A DEFICIT OF WHICH WILL REDUCE AND HAS REDUCED BY $5 TRILLION OR ECONOMIC GROWTH OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS. I’M STRUGGLING TO FIND THE BENEFIT IN BEING THE TRADING PARTNER OF SUCH A BUNCH OF THIEVES.>>THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT, YOU’RE 100% RIGHT. I THINK THE PRESIDENT IS PUSHING THE RIGHT ISSUE THERE. LOU: ABSOLUTELY IS.>>TRADE DEFICITS DON’T MATTER MOST OF THE TIME. LOU: WHOA!>>WE’VE HAD GOOD YEARS WITH TRADE DEFICITS. LOU: ACADEMIC CONTRACTS LIKE SOME ECONOMIST.>>NO. IF A TRADE DEFICIT OR SURPLUS IS HAPPENING BECAUSE — LOU: GOVERNMENT. THAT IS OUR GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT IS IT NOT, PLUS OR MIE NEWS TRADE DEFICITS.>>WE CAN HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH A COUNTRY IF THEY’RE MAKING STUFF THAT WE WANT TO BUY. LOU: THIS ISN’T AN ACADEMIC OR HYPOTHETICAL, JAMES.>>NO. LOU: THIS IS A THIEVING BUNCH OF COMMUNISTS STEALING OW COMMUNISTS STEALING OUR FUTURE AND BY THE WAY, WE CAN’T BLAME THE CHINESE BECAUSE THEY’VE STOLEN FROM US. WE SHOULD BLAME OURSELVES FOR PERMITTING IT FOR THE PAST TWO DECADES. IT’S MADNESS AND YOU SAY IT DOESN’T MAT CENTER.>>THE ARGUMENT TO DRIVE A HARD BARGAIN WITH CHINA IS — LOU: HOW ABOUT PRESERVATION.>>HARD TO BARGAIN WITH MEXICO. LOU: WHY?>>THESE ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. LOU: YOU’VE GOT 20 TO 30 MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN THIS COUNTRY. THEY’RE EXPORTING THE JOORLT OF METHAMPHETAMINES, MARIJUANA, COCAINE, HEROIN, FENTANYL INTO THE UNITED STATES AND KILLING TENSE OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE. I’M SORRY. CAN I NOT CONSIDER THAT THE ACTS OF AN ENEMY STATE?>>WOULDN’T YOU AGREE THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF MEXICO HAS BEEN MUCH MORE REASONABLE THAN THE GOVERNMENT OF CHINA IN TRADE NEGOTIATIONS. LOU: TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, WE HAVE A TRADE AGREEMENT WITH CAN THAT AND WITH MEXICO.>>THEY JUST CUT A NEW AGREEMENT WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP. THE MEXICANS GAVE HIM A LOT OF WHAT HE WAS ASKING FOR. AND NOW AS WE SEE — LOU: WHAT ABOUT THE MATTERS I DID RAISE WITH YOU THAT IS THE BASIS OF THE CRISIS, THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY THIS NATION FACES. YOU KNOW, IT WAS DECLARED BY THE PRESIDENT.>>I WOULD SAY — LOU: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, DRUG SMUGGLING, SEX TRAFFICKING. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? KNEES ARE THE FACTS OF A FRIENDLY STATE?>>LOOK AT HOW THEY’RE REACTING, MUCH MORE REASONABLY THAN CHINA AND MUCH MORE REASONABLY THAN NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SCHUMER. LOU: YOU’RE GIVING ME A REAL CHOICE HERE. I GET CHUCK SCHUMER, NANCY PELOSI OR LOPEZ OBRADOR OR SEE JINPING. WHAT THE HELL. DO YOU JUDGE THINGS ON WHETHER IT’S REASONABLE OR DO YOU JUDGE WHETHER OR NOT THIS NATION IS ABLE TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE SAFETY OF ITS CITIZENS AND PROTECT ITS BORDERS, SOCHTY AND SOVEREIGNTY.>>THE MEXICANS HAVE COME WITH SERIOUS OPTIONS. MORE TROOPS ON THEIR SIDE OF THE BORDER. MORE ASYLUM REQUESTS HANDLED IN LOU: LOPEZ OBSERVE RA

Fitton: Looks like media was working with FBI to get Trump


I’M DAVID ASMAN SITTING IN FOR LOU DOBBS. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR NOW LOOKING INTO INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT FINDING THAT RUSSIA WANTED TRUMP TO RUN THE PRESIDENCY. THE REVIEW WILL REPORTEDLY LOOK AT DISAGREEMENTS AMONG THE INTEL ANALYSTS AND OTHER FINDINGS WERE MOTIVATED BY POLITICAL OPPOSITION TO MR. TRUMP. PRESIDENT TRUMP TODAY ACCUSING “THE NEW YORK TIMES” OF PROVIDING FALSE STORIES ABOUT HIS ADMINISTRATION TO THE FBI TWEETING OUT JUST REVEALED THAT THE FAILING AND DESPERATE NEW YORK TIMES WAS FEEDING FALSE STORIES ABOUT ME IN THOSE ASSOCIATED WOULD BE TO THE FBI. IT SHOWS A KIND OF UNPRECEDENTED HATRED I HAVE BEEN PUTTING UP WITH FOR YEARS. WITH THIS CROOKED NEWSPAPER, IS WHAT THEY HAVE DONE LEGAL? GEMINA, TOM FITTON, PRESIDENT OF JUDICIAL WATCH WHICH UNCOVERED THE SHOCKING EMAIL. TOM, SURPRISE, SURPRISE! ANTI-TRUMP FORCES IN THE FBI WERE COLLUDING WITH THE NEW YORK TIMES. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF IT?>>THE EMAILS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES HERE “THE NEW YORK TIMES” IS TRYING TO DEFEND ITSELF THEY SAY THEY WERE JUST DOING JOURNALISM. EMAIL TO THE SPOKESMAN TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FROM A NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER. DESCRIBING A STORY THAT COLLEAGUES ARE WORKING ON ABOUT JARED KUSHNER AND RUSSIA. A STORY THAT WE KNOW WAS PLANTED TO MAKE DONALD TRUMP LOOK BAD. AND SUGGEST NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES. NONE OF WHICH HAVE PANNED OUT OF COURSE. THE REPORTER WAS NOT ASKING FOR A COMMENT. HE SENT THE INFORMATION ALONG. AND SO, YOU KNOW THAT SEEMED UNUSUAL. AND THERE IS A SECOND MO “THE NEW YORK TIMES” IS WILLING TO GIVE THE FBI LEADERSHIP A HEAD’S UP, A PREVIEW ON A STORY. SO YOU KNOW, THAT IS JOURNALISM I THINK AMERICANS WOULD BE UPSET ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THE MEDIA IS WORKING WITH THE FBI ON — DAVID: AND WE SHOULD MENTION IT WAS NOT THE ENTIRE FBI. OBVIOUSLY THESE ARE THE ANTI-TRUMP FORCES THE FBI USING THEIR POSITION TO GET THINGS OUT THAT THEY KNEW THE PRESS WAS HUNGRY FOR BECAUSE THE PRESS HATES DONALD TRUMP FROM THE BEGINNING. SO THEY KNEW WHO WAS A RECEPTIVE AUDIENCE.>>YEAH AND, YOU PUT IN A CONTEXT OF ILLEGAL LEAKS TO THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE “WASHINGTON POST”, CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. CONCERNING RUSSIA. THE ANTI-TRUMP YOU KNOW THIS MATERIAL CAME FROM THE CACHE OF DOCUMENTS OF PETER STRZOK AND LISA PAIGE EMAILS. SO THIS IS FURTHER DOCUMENTATION ALSO, THAT PETER STRZOK AND LISA PAIGE WERE IN THE CENTER OF THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION BY THE FBI AND DOJ AND WAS ALSO INVOLVED IN MEDIA RELATIONS. DAVID: AND BY THE WAY WE SHOULD MENTION ONCE AGAIN AS CONGRESSMAN NUNEZ HAS RECENTLY, IN OCTOBER 2016, CHRISTOPHER STEELE, THE GUY BEHIND THE TRUMP DOSSIER MET WITH A DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE AND HE CAME OUT WITH INFORMATION THAT EVEN SHE, ALTHOUGH SHE OBVIOUSLY WAS NOT PRO TRUMP SAID WAS COMPLETELY FALSE INFORMATION. LIKE THERE WAS A MIAMI DIVISION OF THE RUSSIAN CONSULATE WHICH DOES NOT EXIST. SHE PASSED THE INFORMATION ONTO THE FBI AND THE FBI STILL WENT AHEAD AND FULL THROTTLE WITH CHRISTOPHER STEELE AND USING HIS SO-CALLED DOCUMENTATION WHICH SHE TOLD HIM WAS BAD, FOR THE FISA WARRANT.>>NONE OF THAT STOPPED THE STATE DEPARTMENT FROM OTHER DOCUMENTS WE HAVE WITH COLLUDING WITH CONTINUING TO COLLUDE WITH CHRISTOPHER STEELE AND SENT HIS INFORMATION ALONG ALSO TO THE TOP LEADERSHIP OF THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. AND AGAIN, GOING BACK TO YOUR FIRST STORY, YOU BET WILLIAM BARR NICE LOOK AT THAT HIT JOB I SEE ASSESSMENT ON PRESIDENT TRUMP. NO NEW PRESIDENT TRUMP IS GOING TO WIN. I DON’T EVEN KNOW IF PRESIDENT TRUMP KNEW THAT. THE ONLY REASON THAT TRUMPS WANTED HIM TO WIN IT WAS ABSURD. THE THOUGHT HILLARY CLINTON WAS GOING TO WIN AND ACTIVITY LOOK LIKE IT WAS DESIGNED TO PUT HILLARY CLINTON BACK ON HER HEELS AS SHE ENTER THE PRESIDENCY. IT SUGGESTS TO ME OTHERWISE IT WAS POLITICS DESIGNED TO UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMACY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ELECTION. AND YOU CAN LOOK AT THE I SEE ASSESSMENT YOURSELVES, IT IS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.YOU WILL SEE IT IS AS MUCH OF A WEAK ARGUMENT AGAINST DONALD TRUMP AS THE MUELLER REPORT. JUST, I SEE INTELLIGENCE DEEP STATE GARBAGE CREATED BY THE OBAMA GANG. DAVID: I WONDER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS UNCOVERING AND WILL UNCOVER WILL DISCREDIT PORTIONS OF THE MUELLER REPORT OR AT LEAST DISCREDIT HIS INABILITY OR UNWILLINGNESS TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS GOING ON. THE ANTI-TRUMP FORCES WITHIN THE FBI.>>THE PERCEIVED WISDOM EVEN ABOUT RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN ELECTION DESIGNED TO HELP PRESIDENT TRUMP CANNOT BE TAKEN AT FACE VALUE. HE HAS GOT TO LOOK AT EVERYTHING THAT IS EVERYONE ASSUMES IS TRUE. THERE WAS NEVER COLLUSION, IT IS NOT EVEN CLEAR THE RUSSIANS WERE TRYING TO HELP DONALD TRUMP. THEY MAY HAVE WELL BEEN TRYING TO HELP HILLARY CLINTON. WITH NO IDEA DONALD TRUMP WOULD WIN. DAVID: I WANT TO GET YOUR ASSESSMENT ON SOMETHING. THE PRESIDENT WAS INTERVIEWED IT WILL BE SHOWN ON SUNDAY, MEET THE PRESS. HE TALKED ABOUT THE WHOLE PUSH FOR IMPEACHMENT AND NANCY PELOSI WILLINGNESS TO GO THAT WAY NOW. LET ME GET YOUR REACTION.>>WHY DO YOU THINK NANCY PELOSI HAS HELD OFF HER IMPEACHMENT PROCESS?>>I THINK SHE FEELS I WILL –>>YOU THINK IT IS GOOD?>>I THINK I WIN THE ELECTION EASIER BUT YOU KNOW I’M NOT SURE THAT I LIKE HAVING IT. LOOK, I DID NOTHING WRONG. I WAS SPIED ON, WHAT THEY DID TO ME WAS ILLEGAL. IT WAS ILLEGAL ON THE OTHER SIDE I DID NOTHING WRONG. IMPEACHMENT IS A VERY UNFAIR THING BECAUSE NOTHING I DID WAS WRONG. DAVID: I CAN UNDERSTAND THE PRESIDENT. POLITICALLY IT MIGHT ACTUALLY HELP HIM BUT IT IS A STAIN. NO ONE WANTS TO STAY PARTICULARLY IF IT IS TOTALLY UNDESERVED.>>THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT. AND THE PRESIDENT OBVIOUSLY IS CONCERNED THAT THEY WILL CONTINUE WITH IMPEACHMENT FIGHT. EVEN IF THEY LOSE OR EVEN IF HE WINS, IT IS AN ABUSE OF POWER BY CONGRESS EVEN TALKING ABOUT IT. THERE IS NO COLLISION, NO OBSTRUCTION. NO CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT. AND NANCY PELOSI THINKS THAT SOMETHING SENSIBLE THE OTHER DAY BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING. SHE SAID LOOK, IMPEACHMENT SOMETHING THAT IS OBVIOUS. THERE’S SOMETHING OUT THERE THAT OBVIOUSLY SOMEONE IS TO BE IMPEACHED FOR.

Giuliani slams ‘swamp media’, says it’s time to fight back against Dems


COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY’S INSPECTOR GENERAL. LOU: IT TURNS OUT SCHIFF HAD EARLY NOTICE.>>YOU ARE SURPRISED HE IS CONSPIRING TO LEVEL FALSE CHARGES AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? THE GUY WHO CLAIMED HE HAD DIRECT EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION? LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? AS PART OF THE OTHER CONSPIRACY TO FRAME. THAT’S WHY WE ARE CONSIDERING A LAWSUIT. REMEMBER HE DOESN’T HAVE IMMUNITY WHEN HE’S OFF THE FLOOR OF THE CONGRESS. AND HIS STATEMENT ABOUT HAVING THIS EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION WAS MADE TO A REPORTER. THE SUPREME COURT CASE SAYS YES, SAY IT TO CONGRESS, YOU ARE IMMUNE. PUT IN A PRESS RELEASE, YOU ARE LIABLE LIKE ANYBODY ELSE. WE ARE CONSIDERING A LAWSUIT TO VINDICATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE PRESIDENT, THE PRESIDENT’S ADMINISTRATION, TO ALSO REMEDY THE PROGRAM TRAMPLING ON THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF MANY, MANY PEOPLE. LOU: INCLUDING THE RIGHTS OF HIS ATTORNEY. THIS IS AN EFFORT TO INTIMIDATE YOU.>>THEY ARE GOING AFTER BARR WHO IS HIS GOVERNMENT ATTORNEY. THEY ARE GOING AFTER ME WHO IS HIS PRIVATE COMMUNITY. WITH BARR THEY ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE. REMEMBER THEY WERE CHARGING THE PRESIDENT WITH OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? SO WHY ISN’T IT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IF DEMOCRATIC SENATORRED REACH OUT TO FOREIGNERS AND SAY DON’T COOPERATE WITH BARR. IT’S AN INVESTIGATION OF AN ALLEGED CRIME INVOLVING ADVANCED MANIPULATION OF INTELLIGENCE SERVICES IN ITALY, THE UKRAINE, THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA. THAT’S ALSO AN ATTEMPT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY. THEIR INTERFERENCE WITH BARR IS ATTEMPTING TO INTERFERE WITH BARR TRYING TO MAKE SURE THE LAW IS EXECUTED.>>I HAVE A GOOD RECORD OF GOING AFTER SCOUNDRELS INCLUDING THE MAFIA AND THE UNIONS. THEY WERE A HELL OF A LOT SMARTER THAN SCHIFF. SCHIFF SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS REMARKS ON THE — FLOOR OF THE HOUSE AND HE WOULD HAVE BEEN IMMUNE. BUT WHEN HE STARTS SPOUTING ALL OVER THE PLACE, AND I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT WHETHER HE’S INVOLVED IN SETTING UP THE WHISTLEBLOWER THING. BUT A MONTH BEFORE I CAN SHOW HIM SAYING THINGS REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT THE WHISTLEBLOWER’S COMPLAINT HAS TONIGHT, WHICH IS MORE A LEGAL BRIEF. IT HAS TO BE A WASHINGTON LAWYER, I HAVE A SUSPICION — WHICH WOULD YOU BE SURPRISED IF IT WAS A DEMOCRATIC PARTISAN WHO DID IT? I WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED. THIS COULD BE THE SECOND SETUP, BY THE WAY. NOW IT’S TIME TO FIGHT BACK. IT’S TIME TO HOLD THESE PEOPLE LIABLE FOR THREATENING TO ARREST THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEY GENERAL. THAT’S NOT INTIMIDATION. IT’S NOT INTIMIDATION TO THREENT DISBAR ME BECAUSE I’M DOING MY JOB? WHAT’S GOING TO COME OUT TOMORROW IS THE REFUTABLE — THE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. I DELIVERED IT TO THEM AND CONDUCTED IT BEFORE THE MUELLER WAYS WAS OVER — THE MUELLER CASE WAS OVER. I BEGAN THIS INVESTIGATION IN NOVEMBER OF 2018. I CONCLUDED IT BY THE END OF MARCH. MUELLER HAD JUST CONCLUDE HIS INVESTIGATION THEN. MY KEY INTERVIEWS WERE IN JANUARY WHEN MUELLER WAS STILL TRYING TO FRAME HIM IN THE WORST WAY POSSIBLE. THIS EVIDENCE WAS VALUABLE TO ME IN DEFENDING HIM. THAT’S WHY I GATHERED HIM. BIND WASN’T A CANDIDATE THEN. I DIDN’T EVEN THINK HE WOULD BE A CANDIDATE. HE LOOKED LIKE HE COULDN’T WALK ACROSS THE STREET. LOU: THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WANTED THE ORIGINS OF THE 2016 CONSPIRACY AGAINST HIM INVESTIGATED.>>THE UKRAINIANS CAME TO ME, I DIDN’T GO LOOKING FOR THEM. THEY TOLD ME FOR A YEAR AND A HALF THEY WERE TRYING TO GET TO THE FBI. THEY HIRED A LAWYER TO TRY TO GET TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THEY COULDN’T GET TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THE REASON I GAVE IT TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT WAS BECAUSE MY WITNESSES DIDN’T TRUST THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. I TRIED TO CONVINCE THEM THAT ONCE BILL BARR WAS THERE THEY DIDN’T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BUT THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT. I DELIVERED SOME OF THE NOTES I HAD, THEN I EXPECTED I WOULD HEAR BACK, AND I NEVER HEARD BACK. THEY NEVER EVEN GAVE ME THE COURTESY OF CALLING ME IN TO ASK ME ABOUT THE CREDIBILITY OF THESE THINGS. THEY NEVER TALKED TO THE PRINCIPAL WITNESSES, AND I THINK THE DEEP STATE PEOPLE STRIDE TO DEEP STATE IT BECAUSE I NEVER HEARD ANOTHER WORD ABOUT IT. I BET WE WON’T FIND A REPORT OF AN INVESTIGATION LIKE THAT. THAT’S WHAT I WOULD DO. LOU: THEY ARE TBLIGHT INSPECTORS GENERAL.>>OBAMA HOLDOVER? LOU: CORRECT. ATKINSON FROM THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. HE IS.>>HE DID A GOOD JOB THE OBAMA JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THIS GUY MISSED PETER STRZOK, McCABE, COMEY. LOU: DOESN’T IT STRIKE YOU — HE’S A HELL OF AN INVESTIGATOR. I DON’T THINK I WOULD HIRE HIM WHEN I WAS U.S. ATTORNEY. LOU: DOESN’T IT STRIKE YOU AS QUESTIONABLE THAT THE NATIONAL MEDIA DOESN’T WANT TO DISCUSS THIS?>>THERE IS NO WAY I CAN DESCRIBE HOW DISGUSTED I AM WITH HOW CORRUPT THE SWAMP MEDIA IS. I KNEW WHEN THEY TOLD ME ABOUT BIDEN. THIS CAME TO ME AS UKRAINIAN COLLUSION. IN THE MIDDLE I SAID JOE BIDEN FIXED THE CASE AGAINST HIS SON, SOROS AND BURISMA. AND I SAID WHAT DO YOU MEAN FIXED THE CASE. HE SAID COME ON, EVERYBODY IN UKRAINE KNOWS. DIDN’T YOU SEE THAT INTERVIEW? HE SAID NO I NEVER SAW THE INTERVIEW. HE SHOWED ME THE INTERVIEW WITH BIDEN. I SAID OH, MY GOD WEB’S GUILTY. HE DIDN’T MENTION HIS SON. HE KEPT HIS SON OUT OF IT. THEN THEY GAVE ME THE DOCUMENTS. I HAVE SEEN THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS OF THE INVESTIGATION, OF THE LAUNDERED MONEY, THE MONEY THAT WENT TO HUNTER BIDEN FROM LATVIA TO CYPRUS, TO THE U.S. I HAVE THE NOTES BACK FROM CYPRUS. PER U.S. GOVERNMENT WE CAN’T GIVE YOU IDENTITIES FOR HUNTER GOOD BIND AND DEVON HUNTER. EVERYBODY KNOWS THEY GAVE THEM OUT. THEN SHOKIN TESTIFIES WHEN HE CALLED HE WAS TOLD THE U.S. EMBASSY SAID DON’T GIVE OVER THE AMOUNTS ON HUNTER BIND AND LEVON. BIND SAID HE DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT BURISMA. IT’S SO OBVIOUS, IT TAKES ALMOST A CORRUPT MIND NOT TO SEE IT. IT’S LOGICAL. WHAT HAPPENED IS LOGICAL. LET ME PUT IS THIS WAY. THERE IS ANY SERIOUS ADULT HUMAN BEING THAT THINKS A MULTI-BILLIONAIRE, UKRAINIAN OLIGARCH WHO FLED UKRAINE, WORKED WITH RUSSIA AND STOLE $5 BILLION IS GOING TO PAY THIS KID $3 BILLION TO $8 BILLION? THERE IS ANYBODY WHO THINKS CHINA WOULD GIVE THIS KID 2 CENTS? OR WERE THEY BUYING AND COMPROMISING THE OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. AN ODOR THAT WAS SO FOUL THAT EVERYBODY IN UKRAINE USED TO LAUGH SAT JOE BIDEN WHEN HE — LAUGH AT JOE BIDEN WHEN HE TALKED WITH CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE. LOU: THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEY WHO HAS HIS OWN ATTORNEY, JOHN SAIL, TO REPRESENT YOU AND ALL THE MATTERS ATTACHED TO THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.>>NEVER AUTHORIZED BY A VOTE OF CONGRESS IN ORDER TO DEPRIVE THE PRESIDENT OF THE RIGHT TO CALL WITNESSES. THE REASON IS TO AGAIN TRAMPLE HIS RIGHT TO CALL WITNESSES IN HIS DEFENSE. SO THEY WON’T GIVE HIM THAT RIGHT. THEY TAKE HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL. SHOKIN WANTS TO TESTIFY OPENLY AND POINT THE FINGER SAT BIDEN AND SAY HE’S A CROOK. THE MINUTE THE AFFIDAVIT CAME OUT THEY KNEW I HAD IT. THAT’S WHY THEY TRIED TO SILENCE ME. IT’S NO ACCIDENTAL I PUT THE AFFIDAVIT OF SHOKIN OUT. THREE HOURS LATER THEY SAY WE DEMAND THE PRESS NOT INTERVIEW HIM. WHO DOES THAT OTHER THAN SOMEBODY WHO THINKS THEY OWN THE PRESS. THEY ARE TRYING TO DESTROY MY REPUTATION. I GET CALLS ABOUT DID YOU REPRESENT SOMEBODY 10 YEARS AGO OR DID YOU DO THIS OR DID YOU DO THAT? I SAY WHAT DOES IT MATTER. WHY DON’T YOU INVESTIGATE THE CASE FIRST THEN YOU CAN GO AFTER THE PROCESS. LOU: NO ONE WOULD HAVE A MORE PUBLIC RECORD IN HIS PROFESSION –>>IF THE MAFIA COULDN’T GET ME AND THE FARC, THESE PIPSQUEAKS AREN’T GOING TO GET ME. LOU: WE HAVE 30 SECONDS TO WRAP UP. THE TRANSCRIPT SAYS THERE IS NO ISSUE. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAS SO RULED. WHY IN THE WORLD — WHERE DO WE GO AND WHY CAN’T THIS BE CONCLUDED QUICKLY?>>BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATS ARE ENGAGED IN AND I ILLEGAL CONSPIRACY TO TAKE HIM OUT OF OFFICE AT ANY COST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE’S LEGAL OR ILLEGAL OR THEY PERPETUATE LIES. THIS IS A PLAN THAT STARTED WITH PETER STRZOK TO PREVENT HIM FROM GETTING INTO OFFICE AND THE UNDERSTAND PLAN WAS TO FRAME HIM IF HE GOT INTO OFFICE. THE FIRST ALLEGATION IS ONE THAT WAS SERIOUS. THE SECOND ONE IS A JOKE. THE CONVERSATION IS COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS. HE DOESN’T THREATENING WITH HE DOESN’T USE MONEY. JOE BIDEN DOES ALL THAT AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SUPPRESS IT. LOU: WHEN DO THE LAWSUITS WITH YOU AND THE PRESIDENT BEGIN?>>THEY TAKE TIME TO PUT TOGETHER. I GOT A WHOLE NEW SET OF ALLEGATIONS TODAY THAT COULD BE EVEN MORE SERIOUS. MAYBE NOT. I HAVEN’T CHECKED THEM OUT YET. LOU: YOU ARE JUST GUESSING?>>I AM NOT GUESSING. I HAVE HAD ALLEGATIONS THAT COME TO ME THAT TURN OUT TO BE TRUE. I HAVE ALLEGATIONS THAT ARE IDIOTIC, AND ALLEGATIONS I THINK HAVE TRUE BUT I CAN’T PROVE.

Mnuchin breaks down where US-China trade talks stand today


>>OUR NEXT GUEST WILL BE MEETING WITH THE VICE PREMIER OF CHINA IN EARLY OCTOBER, TO RESUME TRADE TALKS. JOINING US, TREASURY SECRETARY STEUF STEVF STEVE EN MNUCHIN.>>THANK YOU. LOU: LET’S START WITH CHINA AND UNITED STATES AND WHERE WE ARE IN NEGOTIATIONS, IF THEY COULD STILL BE CALLED THAT.>>I THINK YOU KNOW THAT AMBASSADOR LIGHTHIZER AND I HAVE BEEN AT THIS FOR A WHILE. PRESIDENT HAS BEEN CLEAR, IF WE GET THE RIGHT DEAL WE CAN DO A DEAL, IF WE CAN’T, SHE HAPPY WITH THE –TH THE –HE THE –HE IHE –HE ISE –HE IS HAPPY WITH THE TARIFFS. LOU: ANYTHING APPROACHING TO END OF THREAT OF OF HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TECHNOLOGY TO BALANCE TRADE IS A PRESENT OF ANY AGREEMENT?>>WELL FROM OUR FIRST MEETING WITH TRUMP AND PRESIDENT XI, PRESIDENT XI AGREED THAT REBALANCING THE TRADE DEFICIT WAS ARY PRIORITY, WE’VE BEEN WORKING TWO YEARS OAR THAT, THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED WE HAVE IF HAVE A FAIR AND RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP WITH TRADE, IT HAS BEEN A ONE WAY STREET. LOU: IT HAS BEEN SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE CHINESE ADVENTURE, IF YOU WILL, HAS IT NOT? RIGHT NOW AGRICULTURE WILL BE NUMBER ONE EXPORT OF THE UNITED STATES IT IS EXTRAORDINARY TO ME AS AN OUTSIDER LOOKING IN, THAT IT WOULD BE OUR FIRST MOVE FORWARD.>>WELL, IT IS NOT THAT AGRICULTURE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE. THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE AS YOU SAY IS THE “INSIDE POLITICS.” INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UP. I WOULD SAY THAT YOU KNOW WE TAKE IT AS A PERSONAL OFFENSE THEY STOPPED BUYING AGRICULTURE. GOOD NEWS THAT CHINESE AGREED, THEY STARTED BUYING AGAIN, THIS IS THE GOOD NEWS, A SIGN OF GOOD GISTURE, THEY ARE — GESTURE THEY ARE BACK AT TABLE. THEY ARE IMPORTANT PEOPLE WHO HAVE SUPPORTED PRESIDENT. LOU: I AM SOYBEAN CONSUMER LIKE NEARLY EVERYONE HERE. AND I APPRECIATE THAT. I DO FIND IT A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND WHY CHINA IS SO RED RETICENT TOO ACKNOWLEDGE — PRESIDENT HAS I THINK BEEN BRILLIANT TALKING ABOUT AGRICULTURE, AND MOVED BACK POSITIONIVE IN CAN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, ABOUT 26 BILLION TO THE FARMERS. OUT OF THAT ALMOST NOW MORE THAN SIMPT BILLION 70MPT BILLION 70 BT BILLION 70 BILBILLION 70 BILLILLION 70 BILLIONION 70 BILLION IN TARIFFS, THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY TO ME INNOVATIVE WAY TO DEAL WITH THE AGRICULTURE.>>I AGREE, AND PRESIDENT WAS DETERMINED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FARMERS WERE NOT COLLATERAL DAMAGE IN THE DISCUSSIONS. GOOD NEWS, I THINK THAT THERE IS A DESIRE FOR CHINA TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE REFORMS. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN ISSUES INTERNALLY, I THINK THEY ARE FOCUSED ON. LOU: WE MENTIONED THAT SHELDON ADELSON, WAS TELLING — ACCORDING TO THE REPORT IN THE “WALL STREET JOURNAL” — THAT YOU KNOW HE DIDN’T THINK IT WAS A GREAT IDEA TO PROCEED WITH TARIFFS TO DISRUPT THE RELATIONSHIP. BUT UNDERSTANDABLY. HIS MOST OF HIS REVENUE IS FROM MACSAU, A HOTBED OF GAMBLING ENTERPRISE.>>HE HAS BEEN A GREAT SUPPORTER OF THE CAMPAIGN OF THE PRESIDENT, I THINK HE HAS THE RIGHT INTENTIONS, AS YOU SAY, HE DOES HAVE INTEREST THERE, BUT ONE ISSUE, HE IS GOOD PERCEPTION FROM HAVING DONE BUSINESS IN CHINA. THAT IS REALLY HIS COUNSEL BUT HE’S THE RIGHT CUT OUTCOME, HE UNDERSTANDS ISSUES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, THIS IS THE FIRST PRESIDENT THAT HAS CONFRONTED THESE ISSUES. LOU: IT IS STUNNING WHEN WE THINK ABOUT CHRONIC YEAR AFTER YEAR TRADE DEFICIT WITH CHINA. AND WALL STREET ARGUING IT IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME, THERE NO AFFECT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH, IT DOES AFFECT NATIONAL SAVINGS AND REDUCE THE RATE OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THIS COUNTRY. THIS PRESIDENT AND YOU, AND THE LIGHTHIZER HAVE STOOD UP AGAINST THE CHINESE, I THINK FIRST YEAR THEY TRIED TO GET OVER THE SHOCK OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT TO SAY YOU CANNOT LOOT.>>PRESIDENT USES TARIFFS STRATEGICALLY, HE IS RIGHT, IF NOT FOR TARIFFS NOBODY WOULD BE AT THE TABLE NEGOTIATING, THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TOOL IN REBALANCESES THIS RELATIONSHIP. LOU: TALKS WILL BE UNDERWAY SHORTLY TO DO JUST THAT, WE’LL CONTINUE OUR CONVERSATION WITH

Meadows: The foundation of the whistleblower complaint is falling apart


THE UNITED NATIONS. JOINING US TONIGHT IS CONGRESSMAN MARK MEADOWS. MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OVERNIGHT COMMUTE HE. AND MEMBER OF THE FREEDOM OF CAUCUS. GREAT TO HAVE YOU HERE. THIS HAS BEEN QUITE A DAY BEGINNING WITH THE PRESIDENT OF NEW YORK. HE’S HOME NOW. THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE HEARING. I HAVE TO SAY THAT THIS IS AN EXTRAORDINARY MOMENT IN HISTORY, TO SEE ALL THAT WAS REPORTED WE WOULD HEAR AND READ, AND SEEING WHAT WE READ IN THE TRANSCRIPT, AND LOOKING AT THE COMPLAINT. YOUR REACTION SOMEWHAT THE COMMITTEE IS GOING THROUGH RIGHT NOW.>>I LOOKED AT IT AND SAID THERE HAS TO BE FIVE OR SIX MORE PAGES OF THIS TRANSCRIPT BASED ON THE REPORTING. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT YOU START TO SAY THE BUILDUP, THE HYPE, WE HAVE SEEN THIS BEFORE FROM ADAM SCHIFF, THE HYPE OF THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION. NOW THIS IS THE UKRAINIAN COLLUSION. YET WE SAW ADAM SCHIFF IN ALL HIS GLORY TODAY AS CHAIRMAN, HE DIDN’T READ THE TRANSCRIPT. HE HAD TO MAKE IT UP BECAUSE THEY HAD TO BUILD THIS HYPE THAT’S OUT THERE. HERE IS WHAT WE DO KNOW. THE FOUNDATION OF THIS WHISTLEBLOWER’S COMPLAINT IS ALREADY STARTING TO FALL APART. THERE ARE REPORTS OUT JUST A FEW MOMENTS AGO ON PAGE 3 WHERE A WHISTLEBLOWER SAID A WITNESS FOR THE STATE DEPARTMENT IS ON THE CALL. THE STATE DEPARTMENT IS SAYING THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN. WHAT DIDN’T HAPPEN IS THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T DO ANYTHING WRONG, AND IT’S TIME WE ALLOW HIM TO GOVERN ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO ELECTED HIM IN 2016. LOU: WHAT STUNS ME AS I READ THE TRANSCRIPT, I FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE IN AN INDEPENDENT READING OF THAT DOCUMENT, I FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO COME CLOSE TO THE REPORTING. FORGET THE ZEAL OF THE RADICAL DEMS IN WANT TO GO FIND SOMETHING, GRAVE AND IMPEACHABLE IN IT. I CAN’T FIND ANYTHING THAT EVEN SUPPORTS THE REPORT BEING IT IN ADVANCE.>>IT DOESN’T. THERE WERE SELECTIVE LEAKS GIVEN TO DIFFERENT REPORTERS SOURCED BY PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF IT. THERE WERE PROMISED MADE BY THE PRESIDENT. HE DIDN’T MAKE ANY PROMISES. 8 MENTIONS OF JOE BIDEN, THOSE WEREN’T IN THERE. AND WE HAVE A GREAT WITNESS. THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE. ZELENSKY HIMSELF. I AM ALL ABOUT THIS. BUT HERE IS WHAT WE ARE GOING TO FIND. WE’LL FIND ADAM SCHIFF WILL RUSH HIS THROUGH BEFORE IT FALLS APART. THE WHOLE RUSSIA COLLUSION FELL APART. EVERYTHING THEY HAVE GONE COHEN HAS FALLEN APART. HE’S IN JAIL. NOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN THIS THROUGH AND HAVE AN IMPEACHMENT VOTE BEFORE THIS NARRATIVE FALLS APART. BUT IT’S ALREADY FALLING APART. I HAVE NEVER SEEN MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES THIS ENGAGED IN THE HOUSE READY TO DEFEND THIS PRESIDENT. THEY KNOW WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE DOING IS WRONG AND IT’S NOT FAIR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS WELL. LOU: I THINK IT’S CLEAR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THIS IS JUST ANOTHER ASSAULT TO THE RADICAL DEMS AND THE DEEP STATE. THE “NEW YORK TIMES” IS SAYING THE WHISTLEBLOWER IS A CIA OFFICER WHO WAS ON TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT TO THE WHITE HOUSE. IT JUST GETS RICHER AND RICHER AND MORE PREPOSTEROUS THAN THE PREVIOUS DIMM PLOT.>>THERE ARE SIMILARITIES. IN THIS WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT THEY CITE A LOT OF SOURCES IN THE NEWS. WE KNOW FROM THE PREVIOUS RUSSIA COLLUSION NARRATIVE, WHAT DID THEY QUOTE? SOURCES IN THE NEWS THAT THEY PUT IN THE NEWS SO THEY COULD REPORT ON IT. LOU: WHY DO YOU THINK THE PRESIDENT CALLS THAT FAKE NEWS?>>BECAUSE IT’S EXACTLY LIKE THAT. THE REPORTING PRIOR TO THIS WHISTLEBLOWER’S COMPLAINTS COMING OUT AND THE TRANSCRIPTS COMING OUT. AND BRAVO TO THE PRESIDENT FOR RELEASING THOSE. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I KNOW OF IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY WHERE WE HAVE TAKEN A TRANSCRIPT OF TWO LEADERS AND GIVEN IT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNREDACTED. LOU: FUTURE PRESIDENTS WILL HOPEFULLY HAVE THIS PRESIDENT’S INTELLECT AND JUDGMENT ON THEIR OWN.>>AND HOPEFULLY THEY WON’T HAVE

Bruce Ohr shouldn’t be employed: Rep. Biggs


SEGMENT WILL BE QUESTIONING BRUCE OHR. JOINING US TONIGHT, REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN ANDREW BIGGS, HOUSE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND THE FREEDOM CAUCUS. CONGRESSMAN, GOOD TO SEE YOU. NOW SUDDENLY, OHR AND YATES ARE THE FIGURES OF THE HOUR. LET’S START WITH OHR AND WHY DOES HE STILL HAVE A JOB?>>WELL, THAT IS THE ONE THAT LEAVES ME SCRATCHING WHAT LITTLE HAIR I HAVE LEFT. I MEAN, THERE IS A GUY THAT PARTICIPATED AND WE WILL FIND PARTICIPATED IN THE CREATION OF THIS FUSION GPS DOSSIER WHICH HE MIGHT HAVE BEEN COLLUDING WITH HIS WIFE OVER THIS, WHO’S WORKING FOR FUSION GPS. THERE IS NO REASON IN THE WORLD BY THIS GUY SHOULD BE EMPLOYED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. LOU: AND SALLY YATES SIGNING OFF ON AT LEAST ONE OF THE FISA WARRANT APPLICATIONS. SHE HAS BEEN OUT OF THE PUBLIC VIEW EVER SINCE SHE RESIGNED AND NOW SUDDENLY BECOMING PROMINENT ONCE AGAIN.>>WELL YEAH, SO I WILL CREDIT FOR ONE THING. SHE KIND OF TRIED TO KEEP A LOW PROFILE AND THIS MAY BE HOPING BECAUSE THE QUESTION IS EXACT ADDRESS. WHAT DID SHE KNOW ABOUT WHAT BRUCE OHR WAS DOING? DO SHE SANCTION WOULD BRUCE OHR WAS DOING AND FACILITATE AND ITCHY LIGHT IN THE FISA WARRANT OR DID SHE HIDE INFORMATION WHEN SHE SIGNED OFF ON THE FISA AFFIDAVIT? LOU: I SAID THAT SHE RESIGNED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP FIRING HER BECAUSE SHE REFUSED TO FOLLOW DIRECTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF OHR, GAVE COMMON IT SEEMS IT IS LOU: THE INVESTIGATIONS OF CONGRESS, AND THE INVESTIGATION OF SPECIAL COUNSEL IN THE INVESTIGATION FIRST OF THE SBI. MY GOD, AT WHAT POINT DO WE SAY THERE SHOULD BE SOME MORE ENERGY AND COMMERCE ITSELF AND I COMPLEMENT YOU AND YOUR COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF THE INVESTIGATIVE IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE THE ONES TAKEN THIS LONG TO DO ANYTHING, WE WOULD MISS SEVERAL ELECTIONS IN THIS COUNTRY AND IT’S JUST INEXCUSABLE TO ME THAT WE’VE GOT THIS KIND OF APATHETIC LEADERSHIP. AND I AM TALKING ABOUT YOUR SPEAKER, PAUL RYAN.>>WELL, THE CONGRESSIONAL TORPOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS IS ABSOLUTELY FRUSTRATING TO ME. YOU KNOW, DON’T FORGET WE ALSO HAVE AN ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS LET THIS THING GO ON. YEAH, IT HAS GONE ON WAY TOO LONG. WE ARE NOT SAYING IN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF PEOPLE, SO WHEN BRENDAN TALKS ABOUT TREASON, WELL HOW ABOUT THE ELECTION? HIMSELF BRIEFING HARRY REID. YOU KNOW, WE ARE GOING TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS IN BRENDAN’S ROLE IN THIS BAND, YOU KNOW, HE HAS A VERY EXPANSIVE VIEW OF WHAT TREASON MAY BE. HE MIGHT JUST BE CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK HIMSELF WHEN HE DOES THAT. LOU: IF YOU CAN REALIZE WHAT HE MEANS BY TREASONOUS, AND HE SAID THAT IT WAS NOTHING SHORT OF TREASON. THE HELSINKI STATEMENT THAT THE PRESIDENT, WHICH IS REALLY MIND-BOGGLING WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT. AND I WAS TRYING TO SAY THAT HE DIDN’T MEAN TREASONOUS. I MEAN, PLEASE, TO THINK HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CIA, HE IS OAFISH, HE IS CLUMSY BEYOND IMAGINATION WITH WORDS AND I DON’T THINK HE KNOWS WHAT THE HEL HE’S TALKING ABOUT TO BEGIN WITH.>>I WANT TO KNOW IF HE MONETIZED HIS SECURITY CLEARANCE POST TO THE POINT BEING. I BELIEVE IT LOOKS LIKE HE DID AFTER MAKING MONEY HAND OVER I WANT TO KNOW, DID HE MONETIZED THIS? LOU: THE OVER 60 FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS WHO ARE SUPPORTING HIM? WHAT IN THE WORLD WITH THE INTELLIGENCE APPARATUS IN THIS COUNTRY UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA? THOSE ARE SOME OF THE MOST — I MEAN, IT IS INEVITABLE. IT IS OUT OF IGNORANCE AND JUST FOOLISHNESS ON THEIR PART.>>DOES IT NOT SPEAK TO THE FACT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN SO BIG AND INTELLIGENCE APPARATUS HAS MAYBE GOTTEN TO INDEPENDENT FROM THE OVERSIGHT THAT CONGRESS IS SUPPOSED TO ME. THESE PEOPLE SAYING HE SHOULD HAVE HIS CLEARANCE. I TRIED TO UNDERSTAND WHY CLASSIFIED JOBS THAT WE HAVE PEERED THAT SHOULDN’T HAPPEN. THEY SHOULDN’T HAVE IT. LOU: THERE IS NO DOUBT OF THAT. ON THIS BROADCAST WE HAVE MADE SERVICE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN ANY ADMINISTRATION SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY LOSE THEIR SECURITY CLEARANCE. FULL STOP UNTIL THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR HIS DEPARTMENT HEADS DECIDE THAT PERSON IS SUCH AN ESSENTIAL VALUE TO GOVERNMENT AND TO THE ADMINISTRATION THAT THEY HAVE A SECURITY CLEARANCE, A NEW ONE ISSUED. THEY JUST SHOULDN’T BE HAPPENING. THIS PRESIDENT HAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAN UP A GOOD MEASURE OF THE SWAMP BY GETTING RID OF THE SECURITY CLEARANCES AS THEY WRITE AND PERK AND PRIVILEGE FOR POLITICAL APPOINTEES. IT IS NONSENSE. IT FUELS MUCH OF THE DEEP STATE IN THIS COUNTRY.>>ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. AND YOU ARE RIGHT IT IS PART OF THE SWAMP. IT IS THE PART PEOPLE DON’T SEE. WHEN IT IS EXPOSED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THEY ARE OUTRAGED. THEY SHOULD BE OUTRAGED. AS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS I AM OUTRAGED. I DIDN’T KNOW ALL THESE PEOPLE HAD THIS TOP CLASSIFIED CLEARANCE UNTIL THIS BRENDAN FLAP. I WAS SHAKING MY HEAD SAYING ALL THESE PEOPLE HAVE CLEARANCE AND ARE THEY MONETIZING IT, ARE THEY GETTING PAID TO GO OUT AND LOU: OF COURSE THEY ARE.

Tom Fitton reacts to bombshell McCabe memo, whistleblower fallout


SARCASTIC. JOINING ME NOW, TOM FITTON PRESIDENT OF JUDICIAL WATCH. LET’S START WITH FIRST OF ALL, ROD ROSENSTEIN’S ROLE IN THIS, AND WHAT WE KNOW OF HIS INTENTIONS AND HOW IT IS HE SURVIVED THIS LONG IF THOSE INTENTIONS WERE NEFARIOUS AS SOME WOULD CLAIM?>>WELL, NO LONGER IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, SO, IT WAS — HE WAS VOLY — HE WAS SOLY — HE WAS SLOY — HE WAS SLOWLY ROLLED OUT THE DOOR I GUESS. HIS EXPLANATIONS I DON’T THINK WERE PERSUASIVE. MR. McCABE HIS CREDIBILITY IS LACKING, THIS MEMO IS WRITTEN THE DAY OF THE MEETING, McCABE SAID HE — THIS IS THE EXTRAORDINARY THING, McCABE SAID I’M INVESTIGATING THE PRESIDENT. HE SAID YOU ARE A WITNESS. ROD ROSENSTEIN CONFESSES. AND SAID I’LL WEAR A WE’RE ON THE PRESIDENT, THEN McCABE SAID, WE’LL GET BACK TO YOU. WE’LL ASK OUR TEAM. NOW WHY WOULD HE PURSUE THAT IF IT WAS A SARCASTIC REMARK? HERE YOU HAVE McCABE AND ROD ROSENSTEIN ABUSING THEIR POWERS TO TARGET PRESIDENT TRUMP. AND SERIOUSLY DISCUSSING IT LOOKS LIKE WEARING A WE’RE ON THE PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE — WIRE, ON THE PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE McCAKE INITIATING A STAY OPERATION ON MANTI OPERATION ON PANTI OPERATION ON PRETI OPERATION ON PRESIDENT, ON HIS OWN, THIS IS DOCUMENTED IN TWO PAGES. WE HAD TO WAIT OVER A YEAR FOR THE FBI TO FINALLY COUGH IT UP. THIS IS THE SORT OF THING THAT THE MEDIA DOES NOT WANT YOU LOOKING AT, AS IT PLAYS ITS UKRAINE GAMBIT IN LATEST OF COOP ARGUMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP, THIS IS THE COOP. THE HEART IS HERE IN THIS DOCUMENT. AND NOW WE’RE TALKING ABOUT PHONE CALLS OVER UKRAINE, UNBELIEVABLE. LOU: IT IS UNBELIEVABLE. PARTICULARLY WHEN YOU CONSIDER THAT NOW IN A PHASED REVELATION IF YOU WILL, FOLLOWING THE ON SET OF THIS MANUFACTURED NONSENSE, BUT AGAIN DIRECTED AT PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES, TO FIND THAT WHISTLE-BLOWER WHOEVER HE OR SHE IS, DID NOT HAVE FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE. WAS OPERATING PURELY ON HEARSAY. AND FURTHER MORE, IS NOT A PERSON OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. THEREFORE COULD NOT HOLD WHISTLE-BLOWER STATUS. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THAT MAKE? DEMOCRATS CONTINUE THEIR NONSENSE, BRAYING IN THE DARK WITH THEIR USUAL IGNORANCE AND VENALITY.>>I SAID IT TWITTER, A MALICIOUS SAD MALICIOUS CAD MALICIOUS CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PRESIDENT. ANYONE THAT HEARS WHAT PRESIDENT SAID TO FOREIGN LEADER AUTOMATICALLY HAS WHISTLE-BLOWER STATUS, YOU KNOW WHAT? I’M BLOWING WHISTLE TO JOE BIDEN, I WANT THEM TOEST INVESTIGATE, AND I AM BLOWING WHISTLE ON PROBE PROBE WHISTLE ON PREBE PROBE WHISTLE ON PRESI PROBE WHISTLE ON PRESIDEROBE WHISTLE ON PRESIDENTBE WHISTLE ON PRESIDENT OBAMA WITH HIS CONVERSATION WITH HILLARY CLINTON, THEY WILL NOT FOLLOW-UP ON THAT AS A MATTER OF LAW, NOR SHOULD ANYONE ELSE TAKE SERIOUSLY THIS OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO TRY TO DERAIL THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO CONDUCT FOREIGN POLICY, THEY WANT TO FREEZE THE PRESIDENT, HE IS NOT ALLOWED TO FIRE FBI DIRECTORS, AND TALK TO FOREIGN LEADERS, NOT ALLOWED TO EXERCISE OVERSIGHT OVER THE CORRUPT FBI OR DOJ, THEY WANT TO MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO DO HIS JOB. WHEN THEY DO, THAT THEY ATTACK OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RESPECT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPPECT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBCT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. WE HIRED HIM TO DO THE JOB, THESE FOLKS ARE IN THE WAY. LOU: I COULD NOT AGREE WITH YOU MORE, THEY SHOULD GET OUT WAS WAY. I WOULD ALSO HOPE AT SAME TIME CONFESS AND TURNED THEMSELVES IN FOR FURTHER CONSTRUCTIVE

Obama admin spied on Israeli military ahead of Iran nuclear deal: report


LOU: JOINING US TONIGHT IS GENERAL JACK KEANE, FORMER VICE CHIEF OF STAFF AT THE U.S. ARMY, RETIRED FOUR STAR GENERAL, FOX BUSINESS SENIOR STRATEGIC ANALYST. GENERAL, GREAT TO SEE YOU.>>GREAT TO BE HERE, LOU. LOU: LET’S START WITH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SPYING ON THE ISRAELIS. ANY QUESTION ABOUT THE OBAMA’S HATRED OF NETANYAHU, PERHAPS OF ISRAEL ITSELF?>>YEAH, WELL I THINK TWO THINGS PROBABLY SPURRED THAT ACTIVITY. YOU KNOW, ONE IS WHAT YOU’RE ALLUDING TO HERE IS THE ABSOLUTE CONTEMPT THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAD FOR THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL, AND I DON’T THINK WE HAVE SEEN ANYTHING QUITE LIKE THAT SINCE THE STATE OF ISRAEL WAS FORMED, YOU KNOW, IN 1948. THEN THE SECOND THING AT PLAY HERE WAS OBAMA WAS PUSHING A DEAL WITH THE IRANIANS, AND HE WAS OBSESSED WITH THAT DEAL, A DEAL AT ALL COST, I MAY ADD, AND WE HAVE SEEN THAT PLAY OUT IN FRONT OF US BECAUSE IT WAS GOING TO BE THE FOREIGN POLICY ACCOMPLISHMENT OF HIS ADMINISTRATION. THAT I THINK THOSE TWO THINGS WERE THE MOTIVATION BEHIND SPYING ON THE ISRAELIS. LOU: IS THERE ANYTHING THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA, ANY LEADER THAT HE FELT BELONGED IN THE SAME ROOM WITH HIM? HE SEEMED TO HAVE DISDAIN FOR EVERYONE BUT IRAN. HE SEEMED TO — IT’S REMARKABLE. HE JUST DIDN’T THINK ANYONE QUITE MEASURED UP TO HIS STANDARDS, INCLUDING OF COURSE PRESIDENT TRUMP WHO HE ALSO SPIED UPON. ANGELA MERKEL WHO WAS HIS — AT LEAST OSTENSIBLY HIS ALLY. HE’S SPYING ON HER.>>WELL, OUR INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, TO BE COMPLETELY UP FRONT HERE, WE DO GATHER INFORMATION AT TIMES ON OUR ALLIES BECAUSE WE WANT TO HAVE A SENSE OF WHERE THEY’RE GOING AND WHAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY UP TO. SECONDLY, THOUGH, I AGREE WITH YOU IN TERMS OF RELATIONSHIP WITH HEADS OF STATES, OTHER THAN SOME OF THE FECKLESS EUROPEAN LEADERS WHICH HE HAD VERY GOOD RELATIONSHIPS WITH AND THEY ADORE HIM, IT’S AMAZING WHERE THOSE RELATIONSHIPS ARE AND HOW THEY IMPACTED ON U.S. FOREIGN POLICY. I DON’T BELIEVE IF YOU TRY TO LOOK AT IT, OBJECTIVELY TO NAME ONE MAJOR FOREIGN POLICY ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WHERE THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY IS BETTER OFF AS A RESULT OF IT. I CAN’T NAME A SINGLE ONE.>>DO YOU FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THREE SENATORS, COLLINS ROMNEY AND LEE, GOING AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR DOING WHAT OTHER PRESIDENTS HAVE DONE, DIVERTING FUNDS. THEY DIDN’T SAY A WORD ABOUT ROLLING BACK OF OUR MILITARY OR DETERIORATION OF OUR MILITARY UNDER BUSH AND OBAMA. THAT COME AFTER THIS PRESIDENT. ISN’T THAT NAUSEATING, THE LEADER OF THEIR OWN PARTY?>>THE PRESIDENT IS WITHIN HIS OWN RIGHTS TO TAKE APPROPRIATED MONEY, CONGRESS APPROVED THAT MONEY, TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LARGELY WRAPPED UP IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE THE PRESIDENT TO ADJUST THESE PRIORITIES. LOU: THE SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMED SPECIFICALLY WHAT THIS PRESIDENT WAS DOING AND THREE REPUBLICANS WHO SHOULD BE SUPPORTING HIM ON ISSUES OF NATIONAL SECURITY INCLUDING BORDER SECURITY, INCLUDING ON THE FIGHT AGAINST SEX TRAFFICKING, HUMAN SMUGGLING DRUG TRAFFICKING AS WELL. IT IS STUNNING, DON’T YOU THINK?>>THERE’S NO DOUBT WE HAVE A SOVEREIGNTY ISSUE AND NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE ON OUR SOUTHERN BORDER. THE PRESIDENT HAS THE MOST INFORMATION TO DEAL WITH THAT THAN ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT, IN TERMS OF WHERE ALL THAT

Obama officials to testify on Andrew McCabe’s behalf: report


NOT BE TESTIFYING. JOINING US, VICTORIA TOENSING, THE FORMER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE JUST FIRST DEPARTMENT. JOE DIGENOVA. THE FOUNDING PARTNERS OF THE DIGENOVA AND TOENSING LAW FIRM. ANDREW McCABE MOST OF OF US ARE TOLD HE’S AWAITING INDICTMENT. BUT THE DEEP STATE AND THE RADICAL DIMMS LINING UP TO SUPPORT THEM.>>IT’S NOT SURPRISING THAT HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS MIGHT WANT TO TESTIFY TO HELP HIM OUT. WHEN THEY GET ON THE WITNESS STAND TO GIVE CHARACTER TESTIMONY, HERE IS GOING TO BE THE FIRST QUESTION FROM THE PROSECUTORS. I HAVE IN MY HAND A TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING THAT MR. McCABE AND HERE IS WHAT HE SAID ABOUT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNDER OUR LAWS. FIRST WE F FLYNN, THEN WE F TRUMP. DO YOU AGREE THAT’S THE WAY A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE CONDUCTED MISS McCORD OR MISS ANYBODY. THISSERS A FOOL’S END. THEY ALL DESERVE EACH OTHER.>>McCABE OUGHT TO APPRECIATE HOW MUCH BETTER HE’S BEING TREATED BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THAN HE TREATED GENERAL FLYNN. FLYNN HAD ONE INTERVIEW AND IT WAS A GOTCHA. BILL BARR’S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DID NOT GO TO McCABE AND SAY WE ARE GOING AFTER YOUR SON OR CORRUPT WIFE WHO TOOK MONEY WHEN SHE WAS RUNNING FOR THE SEAT IN VIRGINIA. AND WHEN McCABE LIED HE DID IT TO COVER UP MISCONDUCT. AND WHEN FLYNN REPORTEDLY DIDN’T TELL THE TRUTH, HEP. LOU: HOW MUCH ARE WE GOING TO BE THANKING BILL BARR OURSELVES? WE SEEM TO BE SOMETHING OF A STASIS. WE ARE LOCKED IN THIS PARTICULAR MOMENT WITHOUT APPARENT ADVANCEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION OF THE PEOPLE THAT WE KNOW WE HAVE THE I.G. REPORTS, WE HAVE GOT DOCUMENTS, TEXTS, EMAILS. AND THE AND -HE AND –E AND — THE THINGS WE DON’T HAVE ARE JUST AS COMPELLING IN TERMS OF THE GUILT THAT THEY CAN BE EXTRAPOLATED. WHEN IS BIG BAR GOING TO MOVE THIS THING AHEAD.>>WE ARE BAT AN INFLECTION POINT. D WE ARE AT AN INFLECTION POINT. THE DURHAM REPORT AND THE HOROWITZ REPORT ON THE FISA ABUSE ARE ALL COMING TOGETHER ONE TIME. BILL BARR IS A STRONG WILLED INDIVIDUAL. HE WILL NOT BE AFRAID TO BRING CASES THAT NEED TO BE BROUGHT. AND HE WILL NOT AFRAID TO SAY WE DON’T HAVE THE HORSES ON THIS. BUT THE ONE THING HE IS GOING TO DO, WHEN THERE IS A PUBLIC RELEASE OF THE DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS WHICH I UNDERSTAND IS VERY CLOSE TO A PARTIAL RELEASE VERY, VERY SHORTLY. I THINK HE’S GOING TO LOWER THE HAMMER IN A PUBLIC WAY THAT WILL BE QUITE REVEALING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. I AM JUST NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SOME DELAY HERE.>>HE HAS TO DO IT WITHOUT THE USUAL HELP OF THE HOUSE. AND OF COURSE HE DOESN’T HAVE THE MEDIA. THEY ALREADY STARTED TO SAY,